Home / Representativeness

Representativeness of keep.eu data

Keep.eu has extensive data on projects, programmes and partners of Territorial Cooperation involving the European Union, since 2000. And it adds more by the minute, even though updates to this page only come once a day, after business close.

This page provides an understanding of how much keep.eu covers the projects and partners in the overall sector made up of Interreg, Interreg-IPA and ENI cross-border to this date.

The charts and base figures show how representative keep.eu is overall. The Excel exports contain how each single field is represented, both at programme-type and at programme levels.

Important note: Language detection faces a challenge when determining the language of fields with very little text. This may lead to errors.

The FAQ entry on data contains important information regarding the full array of data, their meaning, concepts pertaining to data in keep.eu, processes, among many other issues that provide a solid understanding of data in keep.eu.

Important dates to understand keep.eu’s representativeness

  • 2020-07-02, last addition of projects or partnerships to the keep.eu database.
  • 2020-05-26, latest counting of projects/partnerships from all programmes’ websites.
  • 2020-07-31, foreseen next counting of projects/partnerships from all programmes’ websites.

Projects in keep.eu versus the sector (%)

The chart compares the number of projects in the database with the overall number of actual projects. The latter is collected manually from all the Interreg, Interreg-IPA and ENI cross-border programmes’ websites every three months. Be sure to check the dates on the top-right side of this page to understand when the last count was and when the next one will be.

Important note: Keep.eu focuses on contracted projects. Representativeness per project thus shows, as much as possible, how many contracted projects there are in keep.eu versus overall. However, some programmes show on their websites the number of approved projects only. In these cases, representativeness is reckoned with the number of approved projects in the denominator. We thus tend to show an apparent representativeness rate of keep.eu somewhat below the real one.

Furthermore, to refer to the figures feeding the chart, click the link right below it. For full detail on the representativeness of each project field (per programme type and down to programme), use the Export to Excel button (button to the right of this text).

– Show base figures –
Programme type/programming period 2000-2006 2007-2013 2014-2020 All programming periods
In keep.eu Overall % In keep.eu Overall % In keep.eu Overall % In keep.eu Overall %
Interreg cross-border 6 009 8 690 69% 6 758 7 250 93% 3 791 4 560 83% 16 558 20 500 81%
Interreg transnational 1 131 1 183 96% 1 148 1 236 93% 1 078 1 110 97% 3 357 3 529 95%
Interreg interregional 363 363 100% 333 333 100% 355 363 98% 1 051 1 059 99%
ENPI/ENI cross-border 0 0 100% 926 928 100% 417 537 78% 1 343 1 465 92%
Interreg-IPA cross-border 0 0 100% 633 802 79% 536 545 98% 1 169 1 347 87%
Total 7 503 10 236 73% 9 798 10 549 93% 6 177 7 115 87% 23 478 27 900 84%

Partnerships in keep.eu versus the sector (%)

The chart compares the number of partnerships in the database with the overall number of actual partnerships in the sector. This is collected from all the Interreg, Interreg-IPA and ENI cross-border programmes’ websites every three months. Be sure to check the dates on the top-right side of this page to understand when the last count was and when the next one will be.

Furthermore, to refer to the figures feeding the chart, click the link right below it. For full detail on the representativeness of each partner field (per programme type and down to programme), use the Export to Excel button (button to the right of this text).

– Show base figures –
Programme type/programming period 2000-2006 2007-2013 2014-2020 All programming periods
In keep.eu Overall % In keep.eu Overall % In keep.eu Overall % In keep.eu Overall %
Interreg cross-border 15 597 27 573 57% 24 553 28 194 87% 18 074 23 758 76% 58 224 79 525 73%
Interreg transnational 11 130 11 202 99% 10 999 11 496 96% 8 743 10 361 84% 30 872 33 059 93%
Interreg interregional 3 473 3 473 100% 3 184 3 184 100% 2 763 2 808 98% 9 420 9 465 100%
ENPI/ENI cross-border 0 0 100% 4 216 4 216 100% 1 654 2 394 69% 5 870 6 610 89%
Interreg-IPA cross-border 0 0 100% 1 905 2 357 81% 1 372 1 757 78% 3 277 4 114 80%
Total 30 200 42 248 71% 44 857 49 447 91% 32 606 41 078 79% 107 663 132 773 81%

Programmes with projects featured in keep.eu (%)

Keep.eu contains information on ALL the Interreg (cross-border, transnational and networking), Interreg-IPA cross-border, ENPI/ENI cross-border and IPA-IPA cross-border programmes since 2000. Programme data representativeness is thus 100%.

What the chart compares is the number of programmes featuring projects in the database with the overall number of existing Interreg, Interreg-IPA and ENI cross-border programmes (IPA-IPA cross-border programmes are not included in this reckoning, since the goal is, for these programmes’ projects, to show in keep.eu a qualitatively, as opposed to quantitatively, representative set).

To refer to the figures feeding the chart, click the link right below it. For full detail on the project and partner representativeness per programme type and per programme, use the Export to Excel button (button to the right of this text).

– Show base figures –
Programme type/programming period 2000-2006 2007-2013 2014-2020 All programming periods
In keep.eu Overall % In keep.eu Overall % In keep.eu Overall % In keep.eu Overall %
Interreg cross-border 62 64 97% 55 55 100% 51 60 85% 168 179 94%
Interreg transnational 13 13 100% 12 13 92% 12 15 80% 37 41 90%
Interreg interregional 7 7 100% 3 4 75% 3 4 75% 13 15 87%
ENPI/ENI cross-border 0 0 100% 12 12 100% 11 15 73% 23 27 85%
Interreg-IPA cross-border 0 0 100% 8 8 100% 10 10 100% 18 18 100%
Total 82 84 98% 90 92 98% 87 104 84% 259 280 92%