Representativeness of keep.eu data
Keep.eu has extensive data on projects, programmes and partners of Territorial Cooperation involving the European Union, since 2000. And it adds more by the minute, even though updates to this page only come once a day, after close of business.
This page provides an understanding of how much keep.eu covers the projects and partners in the overall sector made up of Interreg, Interreg-IPA and ENI cross-border to this date.
The charts and base figures show how representative keep.eu is overall. The Excel exports contain how each single field is represented, both at programme-type and at programme levels. An important note in connection with this: Fields with very little text are a real challenge for language detection, which may lead to errors.
The FAQ entry on data contains important information regarding the full array of data, their meaning, concepts pertaining to data in keep.eu, processes, among many other issues that provide a solid understanding of data in keep.eu.
Important dates to understand keep.eu’s representativeness
- 2022-05-17, last addition of projects or partnerships to the keep.eu database.
- 2022-02-11, latest counting of projects/partnerships from all programmes’ websites.
- 2022-05-31, foreseen next counting of projects/partnerships from all programmes’ websites.
Projects in keep.eu versus the sector (%)
The chart compares the number of projects in the database with the overall number of actual projects. The latter is collected manually from all the Interreg, Interreg-IPA and ENI cross-border programmes’ websites every three months. Be sure to check the dates on the top-right side of this page to understand when the last count was and when the next one will be.
Important note: Keep.eu focuses on contracted projects. Representativeness per project thus shows, as much as possible, how many contracted projects there are in keep.eu versus overall. However, some programmes show on their websites the number of approved projects only. In these cases, representativeness is reckoned with the number of approved projects in the denominator. We thus tend to show an apparent representativeness rate of keep.eu somewhat below the real one.
Furthermore, to refer to the figures feeding the chart, click the link right below it. For full detail on the representativeness of each project field (per programme type and down to programme), use the Export to Excel button (button to the right of this text).
| Programme type/programming period | 2000-2006 | 2007-2013 | 2014-2020 | 2021-2027 | All programming periods | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In keep.eu | Overall | % | In keep.eu | Overall | % | In keep.eu | Overall | % | In keep.eu | Overall | % | ||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | 4 713 | 7 159 | 66% | 6 594 | 7 086 | 93% | 4 985 | 5 217 | 96% | 0 | 0 | 100% | 16 292 | 19 462 | 84% | ||
| Transnational | 723 | 723 | 100% | 973 | 973 | 100% | 1 256 | 1 299 | 97% | 0 | 0 | 100% | 2 952 | 2 995 | 99% | ||
| Interregional | 363 | 363 | 100% | 333 | 333 | 100% | 403 | 411 | 98% | 0 | 0 | 100% | 1 099 | 1 107 | 99% | ||
| Cross-border (neighbouring) | 828 | 939 | 88% | 1 068 | 1 070 | 100% | 867 | 928 | 93% | 0 | 0 | 100% | 2 763 | 2 937 | 94% | ||
| Outermost regions | 201 | 253 | 79% | 197 | 285 | 69% | 320 | 324 | 99% | 0 | 0 | 100% | 718 | 862 | 83% | ||
| Cross-border (pre-accession) | 675 | 799 | 84% | 633 | 802 | 79% | 688 | 763 | 90% | 0 | 0 | 100% | 1 996 | 2 364 | 84% | ||
| Total | 7 503 | 10 236 | 73% | 9 798 | 10 549 | 93% | 8 519 | 8 942 | 95% | 0 | 0 | 100% | 25 820 | 29 727 | 87% | ||
Partnerships in keep.eu versus the sector (%)
The chart compares the number of partnerships in the database with the overall number of actual partnerships in the sector. This is collected from all the Interreg, Interreg-IPA and ENI cross-border programmes’ websites every three months. Be sure to check the dates on the top-right side of this page to understand when the last count was and when the next one will be.
Furthermore, to refer to the figures feeding the chart, click the link right below it. For full detail on the representativeness of each partner field (per programme type and down to programme), use the Export to Excel button (button to the right of this text).
| Programme type/programming period | 2000-2006 | 2007-2013 | 2014-2020 | 2021-2027 | All programming periods | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In keep.eu | Overall | % | In keep.eu | Overall | % | In keep.eu | Overall | % | In keep.eu | Overall | % | ||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | 12 354 | 22 459 | 55% | 24 222 | 27 835 | 87% | 23 866 | 27 098 | 88% | 0 | 0 | 100% | 60 442 | 77 392 | 78% | ||
| Transnational | 8 189 | 8 189 | 100% | 10 438 | 10 438 | 100% | 9 979 | 12 994 | 77% | 0 | 0 | 100% | 28 606 | 31 621 | 90% | ||
| Interregional | 3 473 | 3 473 | 100% | 3 184 | 3 184 | 100% | 3 083 | 3 151 | 98% | 0 | 0 | 100% | 9 740 | 9 808 | 99% | ||
| Cross-border (neighbouring) | 2 458 | 2 862 | 86% | 4 525 | 4 525 | 100% | 3 358 | 3 702 | 91% | 0 | 0 | 100% | 10 341 | 11 089 | 93% | ||
| Outermost regions | 791 | 863 | 92% | 583 | 1 108 | 53% | 320 | 1 680 | 19% | 0 | 0 | 100% | 1 694 | 3 651 | 46% | ||
| Cross-border (pre-accession) | 2 935 | 4 402 | 67% | 1 905 | 2 357 | 81% | 1 851 | 2 524 | 73% | 0 | 0 | 100% | 6 691 | 9 283 | 72% | ||
| Total | 30 200 | 42 248 | 71% | 44 857 | 49 447 | 91% | 42 457 | 51 149 | 83% | 0 | 0 | 100% | 117 514 | 142 844 | 82% | ||
Programmes with projects featured in keep.eu (%)
Keep.eu contains information on ALL the Interreg (cross-border, transnational and interregional), Interreg-IPA cross-border, ENPI/ENI cross-border and IPA-IPA cross-border programmes since 2000. Programme data representativeness is thus 100%.
What the chart compares is the number of programmes featuring projects in the database with the overall number of existing Interreg, Interreg-IPA and ENI cross-border programmes (IPA-IPA cross-border programmes are not included in this reckoning, since the goal is, for these programmes’ projects, to show in keep.eu a qualitatively, as opposed to quantitatively, representative set).
Since one of the four interregional programmes (Interact, the programme that manages keep.eu) does not work with projects, it is not included in the overall count of programmes. For this reason, the figures in the chart and table below, and in general for the purposes of representativeness of keep.eu, consider only three interregional programmes.
To refer to the figures feeding the chart, click the link right below it. For full detail on the project and partner representativeness per programme type and per programme, use the Export to Excel button (button to the right of this text).
| Programme type/programming period | 2000-2006 | 2007-2013 | 2014-2020 | 2021-2027 | All programming periods | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In keep.eu | Overall | % | In keep.eu | Overall | % | In keep.eu | Overall | % | In keep.eu | Overall | % | ||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | 46 | 46 | 100% | 53 | 53 | 100% | 54 | 54 | 100% | 0 | 0 | 100% | 153 | 153 | 100% | ||
| Transnational | 8 | 8 | 100% | 10 | 10 | 100% | 12 | 12 | 100% | 0 | 0 | 100% | 30 | 30 | 100% | ||
| Interregional | 7 | 7 | 100% | 3 | 3 | 100% | 3 | 3 | 100% | 0 | 0 | 100% | 13 | 13 | 100% | ||
| Cross-border (neighbouring) | 10 | 10 | 100% | 13 | 13 | 100% | 15 | 15 | 100% | 0 | 0 | 100% | 38 | 38 | 100% | ||
| Outermost regions | 3 | 3 | 100% | 3 | 4 | 75% | 5 | 6 | 83% | 0 | 0 | 100% | 11 | 13 | 85% | ||
| Cross-border (pre-accession) | 8 | 8 | 100% | 8 | 8 | 100% | 10 | 10 | 100% | 0 | 0 | 100% | 26 | 26 | 100% | ||
| Total | 82 | 82 | 100% | 90 | 91 | 99% | 99 | 100 | 99% | 0 | 0 | 100% | 271 | 273 | 99% | ||
Documents
Starting in the 2014-2020 period, the keep.eu team has been collecting output documents on the projects featured in the keep.eu database. The goal is to preserve and aggregate (for ease of search) the wealth of knowledge and expertise gained by the sector’s projects.
It is not possible to precisely reckon how representative our library is, hence we use a proxy, featured in the chart and table below. For instance, many projects produce no thematic documents, or very few, whereas others produce a large number of documents. This doesn’t mean that the former projects do not deliver (document production is mainly a result of a project’s nature, goals, and method). But it means that representativeness will tend to skew negatively. The more documents are collected and published, the more distorted the sense of representativeness will be.
The chart and table below (and the Excel export) should thus only be used as an imperfect gauge of keep.eu’s progress in collecting documents, per programme. Uses beyond that are a misuse of its nature.
Important to know about the process: The keep.eu team collects documents in rounds, each round covering all the programmes with data in keep.eu. It started with the programmes which projects closed the earliest. Documents are collected only for projects that closed at least six months beforehand. Regarding videos, only those in Youtube or Vimeo are embedded in keep.eu. Lastly, in case a transnational project lists the same document in different language editions, only the one in English is uploaded to keep.eu.
Fetching latest table data..
| Programme types | 2014-2020 programmes | Projects in keep.eu closed for more than 6 months and featuring output documents | Projects with documents in keep. eu | % | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | All 2014-2020 programmes | 3 899 | 1 618 | 41% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Finland – Estonia – Latvia – Sweden (Central Baltic) |
79 | 32 | 41% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Germany – The Netherlands | 95 | 35 | 37% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A France-Switzerland | 86 | 0 | 0% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Germany – Denmark | 30 | 24 | 80% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Belgium – Germany – The Netherlands Euregio Meuse-Rhin / Euregio Maas-Rijn / Euregio Maas-Rhein |
12 | 6 | 50% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Italy – Croatia | 70 | 24 | 34% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Germany / Mecklenburg – Western Pomerania / Brandenburg – Poland |
16 | 10 | 62% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Austria – Germany / Bavaria (Bayern – Österreich) |
32 | 1 | 3% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Greece – Bulgaria | 37 | 14 | 38% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Sweden – Denmark – Norway (Öresund – Kattegat – Skagerrak) |
49 | 0 | 0% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Greece – Cyprus | 18 | 16 | 89% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Estonia – Latvia | 38 | 4 | 11% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A France – Belgium – The Netherlands – United Kingdom (Les Deux Mers / Two seas / Twee Zeeën) |
30 | 0 | 0% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Romania – Hungary | 5 | 0 | 0% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Slovakia – Czech Republic | 55 | 53 | 96% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Hungary – Croatia | 29 | 28 | 97% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Italy – Malta | 14 | 13 | 93% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Germany – Austria – Switzerland – Liechtenstein (Alpenrhein – Bodensee – Hochrhein) |
35 | 27 | 77% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Slovenia – Austria | 19 | 14 | 74% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Belgium – The Netherlands (Vlaanderen – Nederland) |
41 | 48 | 117% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Italy – France (Maritime) | 74 | 14 | 19% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Germany / Brandenburg – Poland | 15 | 13 | 87% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Slovakia – Austria | 25 | 10 | 40% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Lithuania – Poland | 56 | 3 | 5% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Czech Republic – Poland | 2 | 0 | 0% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Poland – Germany / Saxony | 39 | 2 | 5% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A France – Belgium – Germany – Luxembourg (Grande Région / Großregion) |
11 | 7 | 64% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A United Kingdom-Ireland (Ireland-Northern Ireland-Scotland) |
7 | 1 | 14% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Greece – Italy | 28 | 21 | 75% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Slovakia – Hungary | 52 | 34 | 65% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Romania – Bulgaria | 100 | 24 | 24% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Sweden – Finland – Norway (Botnia Atlantica) | 26 | 17 | 65% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Belgium – France (France – Wallonie – Vlaanderen) |
96 | 30 | 31% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Austria – Czech Republic | 33 | 0 | 0% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Sweden – Finland – Norway (Nord) | 29 | 24 | 83% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A France – United Kingdom (Manche – Channel) | 8 | 14 | 175% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Germany / Saxony – Czech Republic | 126 | 23 | 18% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A France – Italy (ALCOTRA) | 95 | 15 | 16% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Germany / Bavaria – Czech Republic | 12 | 0 | 0% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Poland – Slovakia | 39 | 14 | 36% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A United Kingdom – Ireland (Ireland – Wales) | 10 | 5 | 50% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Italy – Slovenia | 31 | 26 | 84% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Italy – Austria | 51 | 47 | 92% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Austria – Hungary | 24 | 15 | 62% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Italy – Switzerland | 14 | 2 | 14% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Slovenia – Croatia | 30 | 24 | 80% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Latvia – Lithuania | 69 | 13 | 19% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Slovenia – Hungary | 16 | 14 | 88% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Sweden – Norway | 51 | 46 | 90% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Spain – France – Andorra (POCTEFA) | 91 | 91 | 100% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A France – Germany – Switzerland (Rhin supérieur-Oberrhein) |
92 | 8 | 9% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Spain – Portugal (POCTEP) | 107 | 94 | 88% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Poland – Denmark – Germany – Lithuania – Sweden (South Baltic) |
81 | 10 | 12% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | Ireland – United Kingdom (PEACE IV) | 54 | 0 | 0% | ||||||||||
| Transnational | INTERREG VB Central Europe | 73 | 27 | 37% | ||||||||||
| Transnational | INTERREG VB North West Europe | 15 | 10 | 67% | ||||||||||
| Transnational | INTERREG VB Mediterranean | 73 | 22 | 30% | ||||||||||
| Transnational | INTERREG VB Atlantic Area | 40 | 35 | 88% | ||||||||||
| Transnational | INTERREG VB Danube | 93 | 48 | 52% | ||||||||||
| Transnational | INTERREG VB Adriatic – Ionian | 32 | 27 | 84% | ||||||||||
| Transnational | INTERREG VB North Sea | 15 | 9 | 60% | ||||||||||
| Transnational | INTERREG VB Northern Periphery and Arctic | 99 | 21 | 21% | ||||||||||
| Transnational | INTERREG VB South West Europe | 51 | 27 | 53% | ||||||||||
| Transnational | INTERREG VB Alpine Space | 49 | 15 | 31% | ||||||||||
| Transnational | INTERREG VB Baltic Sea | 148 | 33 | 22% | ||||||||||
| Transnational | INTERREG VB Balkan-Mediterranean | 26 | 9 | 35% | ||||||||||
| Interregional | Interreg Europe | 93 | 56 | 60% | ||||||||||
| Interregional | ESPON 2020 | 54 | 43 | 80% | ||||||||||
| Interregional | INTERACT III | 0 | 0 | 0% | ||||||||||
| Interregional | URBACT III | 51 | 24 | 47% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (neighbouring) | Romania – Republic of Moldova ENI CBC | 7 | 0 | 0% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (neighbouring) | South-East Finland – Russia ENI CBC | 10 | 0 | 0% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (neighbouring) | Latvia – Russia ENI CBC | 6 | 5 | 83% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (neighbouring) | Black Sea Basin ENI CBC | 15 | 9 | 60% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (neighbouring) | Poland – Russia ENI CBC | 1 | 0 | 0% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (neighbouring) | Poland – Belarus – Ukraine ENI CBC | 84 | 0 | 0% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (neighbouring) | Mediterranean Sea Basin ENI CBC | 0 | 0 | 0% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (neighbouring) | Karelia ENI CBC | 12 | 9 | 75% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (neighbouring) | Kolarctic ENI CBC | 13 | 0 | 0% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (neighbouring) | Latvia – Lithuania – Belarus ENI CBC | 12 | 0 | 0% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (neighbouring) | Lithuania – Russia ENI CBC | 11 | 0 | 0% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (neighbouring) | Estonia – Russia ENI CBC | 4 | 0 | 0% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (neighbouring) | Romania – Ukraine ENI CBC | 7 | 0 | 0% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (neighbouring) | Italy – Tunisia ENI CBC | 1 | 0 | 0% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (neighbouring) | Hungary – Slovakia – Romania – Ukraine ENI CBC | 25 | 0 | 0% | ||||||||||
| Outermost regions | INTERREG V-A France (Saint Martin – Sint Maarten) | 0 | 0 | 0% | ||||||||||
| Outermost regions | INTERREG VB Amazonia | 8 | 0 | 0% | ||||||||||
| Outermost regions | INTERREG VB Indian Ocean Area | 0 | 0 | 0% | ||||||||||
| Outermost regions | INTERREG VB Caribbean Area | 13 | 0 | 0% | ||||||||||
| Outermost regions | INTERREG V-A Spain – Portugal (Madeira – Açores – Canarias (MAC)) |
9 | 15 | 167% | ||||||||||
| Outermost regions | INTERREG V-A France (Mayotte / Comores / Madagascar) | 0 | 0 | 0% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (pre-accession) | Interreg IPA CBC Greece – Albania | 18 | 6 | 33% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (pre-accession) | Interreg IPA CBC Greece – Republic of North Macedonia | 40 | 25 | 62% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (pre-accession) | Interreg IPA CBC Romania – Serbia | 40 | 15 | 38% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (pre-accession) | Interreg IPA CBC Bulgaria – Turkey | 81 | 35 | 43% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (pre-accession) | Interreg IPA CBC Bulgaria – Serbia | 82 | 0 | 0% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (pre-accession) | Interreg IPA CBC Bulgaria – Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia |
30 | 20 | 67% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (pre-accession) | Interreg IPA CBC Croatia-Serbia | 20 | 20 | 100% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (pre-accession) | Interreg IPA CBC Croatia – Bosnia and Herzegovina – Montenegro |
22 | 11 | 50% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (pre-accession) | Interreg IPA CBC Italy – Albania – Montenegro | 25 | 25 | 100% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (pre-accession) | Interreg IPA CBC Hungary – Serbia | 7 | 7 | 100% |