Representativeness of keep.eu data
Keep.eu has extensive data on projects, programmes and partners of Territorial Cooperation involving the European Union, since 2000. And it adds more by the minute, even though updates to this page only come once a day, after close of business.
This page provides an understanding of how much keep.eu covers the universe of Interreg programmes, projects and partners – and also how many projects publish output documents and how many of these have their documents featured in keep.eu.
The charts and base figures show how representative keep.eu is overall. The Excel exports contain how each single field is represented, both at programme-type and at programme levels. An important note in connection with this: Fields with very little text are a real challenge for language detection, which may lead to errors.
The FAQ entry on data contains important information regarding the full array of data, their meaning, concepts pertaining to data in keep.eu, processes, among many other issues that provide a solid understanding of data in keep.eu.
Important dates to understand keep.eu’s representativeness
- 2022-11-29, last addition of projects or partnerships to the keep.eu database.
- 2022-11-22, latest counting of projects/partnerships from all programmes’ websites.
- 2023-02-28, foreseen next counting of projects/partnerships from all programmes’ websites.
Projects in keep.eu versus the sector (%)
The chart compares the number of projects in the database with the overall number of actual projects. The latter is collected manually from all the Interreg programmes’ websites every three months. Be sure to check the dates on the top-right side of this page to understand when the last count was and when the next one will be.
Important note: Keep.eu focuses on contracted projects. Representativeness per project thus shows, as much as possible, how many contracted projects there are in keep.eu versus overall. However, some programmes show on their websites the number of approved projects only. In these cases, representativeness is reckoned with the number of approved projects in the denominator. We thus tend to show an apparent representativeness rate of keep.eu somewhat below the real one.
Furthermore, to refer to the figures feeding the chart, click the link right below it. For full detail on the representativeness of each project field (per programme type and down to programme), use the Export to Excel button (button to the right of this text).
| Programme type/programming period | 2000-2006 | 2007-2013 | 2014-2020 | 2021-2027 | All programming periods | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In keep.eu | Overall | % | In keep.eu | Overall | % | In keep.eu | Overall | % | In keep.eu | Overall | % | In keep.eu | Overall | % | |||
| Cross-border (internal) | 4 713 | 7 159 | 66% | 6 594 | 7 086 | 93% | 5 262 | 5 712 | 92% | 0 | 0 | 100% | 16 569 | 19 957 | 83% | ||
| Transnational | 723 | 723 | 100% | 973 | 973 | 100% | 1 276 | 1 342 | 95% | 0 | 0 | 100% | 2 972 | 3 038 | 98% | ||
| Interregional | 363 | 363 | 100% | 333 | 333 | 100% | 403 | 413 | 98% | 0 | 0 | 100% | 1 099 | 1 109 | 99% | ||
| Cross-border (neighbouring) | 828 | 939 | 88% | 1 068 | 1 070 | 100% | 875 | 938 | 93% | 0 | 0 | 100% | 2 771 | 2 947 | 94% | ||
| Outermost regions | 201 | 253 | 79% | 197 | 285 | 69% | 401 | 402 | 100% | 0 | 0 | 100% | 799 | 940 | 85% | ||
| Cross-border (pre-accession) | 675 | 799 | 84% | 633 | 802 | 79% | 763 | 808 | 94% | 0 | 0 | 100% | 2 071 | 2 409 | 86% | ||
| Total | 7 503 | 10 236 | 73% | 9 798 | 10 549 | 93% | 8 980 | 9 615 | 93% | 0 | 0 | 100% | 26 281 | 30 400 | 86% | ||
No. of non-Interreg projects part of EU macro-regional strategies featured in keep.eu: 440
No. of non-Interreg IPA cross-border projects featured in keep.eu: 62
Total no. of projects featured in keep.eu: 26 783
Partnerships in keep.eu versus the sector (%)
The chart compares the number of partnerships in the database with the overall number of actual partnerships in Interreg. This is collected from all the Interreg programmes’ websites every three months. Be sure to check the dates on the top-right side of this page to understand when the last count was and when the next one will be.
Furthermore, to refer to the figures feeding the chart, click the link right below it. For full detail on the representativeness of each partner field (per programme type and down to programme), use the Export to Excel button (button to the right of this text).
| Programme type/programming period | 2000-2006 | 2007-2013 | 2014-2020 | 2021-2027 | All programming periods | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In keep.eu | Overall | % | In keep.eu | Overall | % | In keep.eu | Overall | % | In keep.eu | Overall | % | In keep.eu | Overall | % | |||
| Cross-border (internal) | 12 360 | 22 459 | 55% | 24 227 | 27 835 | 87% | 25 011 | 28 311 | 88% | 0 | 0 | 100% | 61 598 | 78 605 | 78% | ||
| Transnational | 8 189 | 8 189 | 100% | 10 438 | 10 438 | 100% | 10 002 | 13 531 | 74% | 0 | 0 | 100% | 28 629 | 32 158 | 89% | ||
| Interregional | 3 473 | 3 473 | 100% | 3 184 | 3 184 | 100% | 3 083 | 3 161 | 98% | 0 | 0 | 100% | 9 740 | 9 818 | 99% | ||
| Cross-border (neighbouring) | 2 458 | 2 862 | 86% | 4 525 | 4 525 | 100% | 3 376 | 3 730 | 91% | 0 | 0 | 100% | 10 359 | 11 117 | 93% | ||
| Outermost regions | 791 | 863 | 92% | 583 | 1 108 | 53% | 401 | 1 950 | 21% | 0 | 0 | 100% | 1 775 | 3 921 | 45% | ||
| Cross-border (pre-accession) | 2 935 | 4 402 | 67% | 1 905 | 2 357 | 81% | 2 216 | 2 477 | 89% | 0 | 0 | 100% | 7 056 | 9 236 | 76% | ||
| Total | 30 206 | 42 248 | 71% | 44 862 | 49 447 | 91% | 44 089 | 53 160 | 83% | 0 | 0 | 100% | 119 157 | 144 855 | 82% | ||
No. of non-Interreg partnerships part of EU macro-regional strategies featured in keep.eu: 520
No. of non-Interreg IPA cross-border project partnerships featured in keep.eu: 171
Total no. of partnerships featured in keep.eu: 119 848
Programmes with projects featured in keep.eu (%)
Keep.eu contains information on ALL Interreg programmes since 2000. Programme data representativeness is thus 100%.
What the chart compares is the number of programmes featuring projects in the database with the overall number of existing Interreg programmes (IPA-IPA cross-border programmes are not included in this reckoning, since the goal is, for these programmes’ projects, to show in keep.eu a qualitatively, as opposed to quantitatively, representative set).
Since one of the four interregional programmes (Interact, the programme that manages keep.eu) does not work with projects, it is not included in the overall count of programmes. For this reason, the figures in the chart and table below, and in general for the purposes of representativeness of keep.eu, consider only three interregional programmes.
To refer to the figures feeding the chart, click the link right below it. For full detail on the project and partner representativeness per programme type and per programme, use the Export to Excel button (button to the right of this text).
| Programme type/programming period | 2000-2006 | 2007-2013 | 2014-2020 | 2021-2027 | All programming periods | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In keep.eu | Overall | % | In keep.eu | Overall | % | In keep.eu | Overall | % | In keep.eu | Overall | % | In keep.eu | Overall | % | |||
| Cross-border (internal) | 46 | 46 | 100% | 53 | 53 | 100% | 54 | 54 | 100% | 0 | 0 | 100% | 153 | 153 | 100% | ||
| Transnational | 8 | 8 | 100% | 10 | 10 | 100% | 12 | 12 | 100% | 0 | 0 | 100% | 30 | 30 | 100% | ||
| Interregional | 7 | 7 | 100% | 3 | 3 | 100% | 3 | 3 | 100% | 0 | 0 | 100% | 13 | 13 | 100% | ||
| Cross-border (neighbouring) | 10 | 10 | 100% | 13 | 13 | 100% | 15 | 15 | 100% | 0 | 0 | 100% | 38 | 38 | 100% | ||
| Outermost regions | 3 | 3 | 100% | 3 | 4 | 75% | 5 | 6 | 83% | 0 | 0 | 100% | 11 | 13 | 85% | ||
| Cross-border (pre-accession) | 8 | 8 | 100% | 8 | 8 | 100% | 10 | 10 | 100% | 0 | 0 | 100% | 26 | 26 | 100% | ||
| Total | 82 | 82 | 100% | 90 | 91 | 99% | 99 | 100 | 99% | 0 | 0 | 100% | 271 | 273 | 99% | ||
No. of non-Interreg IPA cross-border programmes with projects featured in keep.eu: 17
Total no. of programmes featured in keep.eu: 288
Documents
Starting in the 2014-2020 period, the keep.eu team has been collecting output documents on the projects featured in the keep.eu database. The goal is to preserve and aggregate the wealth of knowledge and expertise gained by the sector’s projects.
It is not possible to precisely reckon how representative our library is, hence we use a proxy, featured in the chart and table below. For instance, many projects produce no thematic documents, or very few, whereas others produce a large number of documents. This doesn’t mean that the former projects do not deliver (document production is mainly a result of a project’s nature, goals, and method). But it means that representativeness will tend to skew negatively.
The chart and table below (and the Excel export) should thus only be used as an imperfect gauge of keep.eu’s progress in collecting documents, per programme. Uses beyond that are a misuse of its nature.
Important to know about the process: The keep.eu team collects documents in rounds, each round covering all the programmes with data in keep.eu. It started with the programmes whose first projects closed the earliest. Documents are collected only for projects that closed at least six months beforehand. Regarding videos, only those in Youtube or Vimeo are embedded in keep.eu. Lastly, in case a transnational project lists the same document in different language editions, only the one in English (or, in the lack thereof, in French or German) is uploaded to keep.eu. For more information about this process, please refer to the FAQ on Documents.
Important about the chart and table below: They show the number of projects that ended at least six months ago and which produced and published documents on a website that is connected to their funding programme’s website versus the number of project pages in keep.eu that feature project documents. We have verified that many project end dates have been changing after our team collected their documents, thereby skewing representativeness (this also explains representativeness levels >100%).
Fetching latest table data..
| Programme types | 2014-2020 programmes | Projects in keep.eu closed for more than 6 months and featuring output documents | Projects with documents in keep. eu | % | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | All 2014-2020 programmes | 4 404 | 2 688 | 61% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (neighbouring) | Black Sea Basin ENI CBC | 25 | 9 | 36% | ||||||||||
| Interregional | ESPON 2020 | 60 | 43 | 72% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (neighbouring) | Estonia – Russia ENI CBC | 20 | 8 | 40% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (neighbouring) | Hungary – Slovakia – Romania – Ukraine ENI CBC | 17 | 4 | 24% | ||||||||||
| Interregional | INTERACT III | 0 | 0 | 0% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Austria – Czech Republic | 30 | 30 | 100% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Austria – Germany / Bavaria (Bayern – Österreich) |
24 | 10 | 42% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Austria – Hungary | 29 | 15 | 52% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Belgium – France (France – Wallonie – Vlaanderen) |
121 | 85 | 70% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Belgium – Germany – The Netherlands Euregio Meuse-Rhin / Euregio Maas-Rijn / Euregio Maas-Rhein |
23 | 6 | 26% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Belgium – The Netherlands (Vlaanderen – Nederland) |
53 | 48 | 91% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Czech Republic – Poland | 15 | 0 | 0% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Estonia – Latvia | 31 | 27 | 87% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Finland – Estonia – Latvia – Sweden (Central Baltic) |
89 | 45 | 51% | ||||||||||
| Outermost regions | INTERREG V-A France (Mayotte / Comores / Madagascar) | 0 | 0 | 0% | ||||||||||
| Outermost regions | INTERREG V-A France (Saint Martin – Sint Maarten) | 0 | 0 | 0% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A France – Belgium – Germany – Luxembourg (Grande Région / Großregion) |
35 | 7 | 20% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A France – Belgium – The Netherlands – United Kingdom (Les Deux Mers / Two seas / Twee Zeeën) |
42 | 40 | 95% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A France – Germany – Switzerland (Rhin supérieur-Oberrhein) |
102 | 35 | 34% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A France – Italy (ALCOTRA) | 91 | 55 | 60% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A France – United Kingdom (Manche – Channel) | 13 | 14 | 108% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A France-Switzerland | 26 | 19 | 73% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Germany – Austria – Switzerland – Liechtenstein (Alpenrhein – Bodensee – Hochrhein) |
50 | 27 | 54% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Germany – Denmark | 46 | 24 | 52% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Germany – The Netherlands | 66 | 35 | 53% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Germany / Bavaria – Czech Republic | 8 | 0 | 0% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Germany / Brandenburg – Poland | 22 | 13 | 59% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Germany / Mecklenburg – Western Pomerania / Brandenburg – Poland |
24 | 10 | 42% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Germany / Saxony – Czech Republic | 79 | 74 | 94% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Greece – Bulgaria | 58 | 14 | 24% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Greece – Cyprus | 18 | 16 | 89% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Greece – Italy | 33 | 21 | 64% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Hungary – Croatia | 82 | 28 | 34% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Italy – Austria | 71 | 47 | 66% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Italy – Croatia | 48 | 24 | 50% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Italy – France (Maritime) | 100 | 79 | 79% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Italy – Malta | 16 | 13 | 81% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Italy – Slovenia | 54 | 26 | 48% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Italy – Switzerland | 35 | 2 | 6% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Latvia – Lithuania | 59 | 56 | 95% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Lithuania – Poland | 8 | 8 | 100% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Poland – Denmark – Germany – Lithuania – Sweden (South Baltic) |
52 | 48 | 92% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Poland – Germany / Saxony | 25 | 2 | 8% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Poland – Slovakia | 41 | 14 | 34% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Romania – Bulgaria | 115 | 74 | 64% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Romania – Hungary | 11 | 0 | 0% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Slovakia – Austria | 28 | 10 | 36% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Slovakia – Czech Republic | 56 | 53 | 95% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Slovakia – Hungary | 88 | 34 | 39% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Slovenia – Austria | 30 | 14 | 47% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Slovenia – Croatia | 30 | 24 | 80% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Slovenia – Hungary | 19 | 14 | 74% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Spain – France – Andorra (POCTEFA) | 146 | 91 | 62% | ||||||||||
| Outermost regions | INTERREG V-A Spain – Portugal (Madeira – Açores – Canarias (MAC)) |
12 | 15 | 125% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Spain – Portugal (POCTEP) | 192 | 155 | 81% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Sweden – Denmark – Norway (Öresund – Kattegat – Skagerrak) |
61 | 22 | 36% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Sweden – Finland – Norway (Botnia Atlantica) | 39 | 17 | 44% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Sweden – Finland – Norway (Nord) | 39 | 24 | 62% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A Sweden – Norway | 66 | 46 | 70% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A United Kingdom – Ireland (Ireland – Wales) | 11 | 5 | 45% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | INTERREG V-A United Kingdom-Ireland (Ireland-Northern Ireland-Scotland) |
27 | 1 | 4% | ||||||||||
| Transnational | INTERREG VB Adriatic – Ionian | 34 | 27 | 79% | ||||||||||
| Transnational | INTERREG VB Alpine Space | 42 | 41 | 98% | ||||||||||
| Outermost regions | INTERREG VB Amazonia | 1 | 1 | 100% | ||||||||||
| Transnational | INTERREG VB Atlantic Area | 66 | 35 | 53% | ||||||||||
| Transnational | INTERREG VB Balkan-Mediterranean | 22 | 29 | 132% | ||||||||||
| Transnational | INTERREG VB Baltic Sea | 116 | 127 | 109% | ||||||||||
| Outermost regions | INTERREG VB Caribbean Area | 10 | 10 | 100% | ||||||||||
| Transnational | INTERREG VB Central Europe | 113 | 92 | 81% | ||||||||||
| Transnational | INTERREG VB Danube | 104 | 73 | 70% | ||||||||||
| Outermost regions | INTERREG VB Indian Ocean Area | 1 | 0 | 0% | ||||||||||
| Transnational | INTERREG VB Mediterranean | 82 | 81 | 99% | ||||||||||
| Transnational | INTERREG VB North Sea | 22 | 9 | 41% | ||||||||||
| Transnational | INTERREG VB North West Europe | 22 | 9 | 41% | ||||||||||
| Transnational | INTERREG VB Northern Periphery and Arctic | 111 | 48 | 43% | ||||||||||
| Transnational | INTERREG VB South West Europe | 54 | 44 | 81% | ||||||||||
| Interregional | Interreg Europe | 140 | 93 | 66% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (pre-accession) | Interreg IPA CBC Bulgaria – Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia |
31 | 20 | 65% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (pre-accession) | Interreg IPA CBC Bulgaria – Serbia | 8 | 0 | 0% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (pre-accession) | Interreg IPA CBC Bulgaria – Turkey | 43 | 39 | 91% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (pre-accession) | Interreg IPA CBC Croatia – Bosnia and Herzegovina – Montenegro |
19 | 10 | 53% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (pre-accession) | Interreg IPA CBC Croatia-Serbia | 27 | 20 | 74% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (pre-accession) | Interreg IPA CBC Greece – Albania | 26 | 6 | 23% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (pre-accession) | Interreg IPA CBC Greece – Republic of North Macedonia | 40 | 25 | 62% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (pre-accession) | Interreg IPA CBC Hungary – Serbia | 35 | 7 | 20% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (pre-accession) | Interreg IPA CBC Italy – Albania – Montenegro | 43 | 25 | 58% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (pre-accession) | Interreg IPA CBC Romania – Serbia | 23 | 15 | 65% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (internal) | Ireland – United Kingdom (PEACE IV) | 65 | 0 | 0% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (neighbouring) | Italy – Tunisia ENI CBC | 0 | 0 | 0% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (neighbouring) | Karelia ENI CBC | 26 | 9 | 35% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (neighbouring) | Kolarctic ENI CBC | 12 | 7 | 58% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (neighbouring) | Latvia – Lithuania – Belarus ENI CBC | 35 | 13 | 37% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (neighbouring) | Latvia – Russia ENI CBC | 8 | 5 | 62% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (neighbouring) | Lithuania – Russia ENI CBC | 14 | 7 | 50% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (neighbouring) | Mediterranean Sea Basin ENI CBC | 1 | 0 | 0% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (neighbouring) | Poland – Belarus – Ukraine ENI CBC | 51 | 29 | 57% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (neighbouring) | Poland – Russia ENI CBC | 10 | 4 | 40% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (neighbouring) | Romania – Republic of Moldova ENI CBC | 38 | 0 | 0% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (neighbouring) | Romania – Ukraine ENI CBC | 0 | 0 | 0% | ||||||||||
| Cross-border (neighbouring) | South-East Finland – Russia ENI CBC | 24 | 7 | 29% | ||||||||||
| Interregional | URBACT III | 74 | 41 | 55% |